State ex rel. City of Bridgeton v. Bridgeton & Millville Traction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
This is a proceeding on a rule to show cause, on the part of the relator, why a writ of mandamus should not issue, commanding the Bridgeton and Millville Traction Company forthwith to resume and discharge its duly as a common carrier of passengers, and the exercise of its franchises by operating and continuing to operate, for the transportation of passengers, the street railway, with all necessary turnouts and switches, the tracks of which were located, by ordinance 66 of the city of Bridgeton, the relator, entitled “An ordinance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. State ex rel. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State ex rel. Morris v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Ellis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- State ex rel. City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.