Legal Opinion
Szlinsky v. Denhup
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
In the present case, the plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries which she sustained when an automobile she was operating collided with an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court accepted the verdict and rendered judgment thereon, from which the defendant has appealed.
We only consider the two assignments of error which the defendant has pursued in his brief. The defendant claims that the supplemental instruction given by the court to the jury after they reported their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Lucier v. Meriden-Wallingford Sand & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. HardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. TinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. Couri Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.