McNee v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Rule by George A. McNee against Hon. R. L. Williams, as Judge of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, to show cause why respondent should not be required, by mandamus to render a final judgment in favor of petitioner as defendant in ;> cause pending in that court, wherein James E. Whitehead: was plaintiff and George A, McNee defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, McNee, caused a rule to issue out oí this court on Hon. R. L. Williams, as District Judge for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, to show cause why he should not be required by writ of mandamus to enter final judgment in favor of the *96defendant in a cause pending in that court entitled “James E. Whitehead, Plaintiff, v. George A. McNee, 'Defendant.” The rule issued on McNee’s petition, which charged that respondent had refused to comply with die mandate of this court in cause No. 5126, entitled “George A. McNee, Plaintiff in Error, v. James A. Whitehead,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ex Parte the Union Steamboat CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grayson v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. LeveringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932