Legal Opinion

Grayson v. Stith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1943No. 29687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

Defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought this action to perpetually enjoin the plaintiffs in error (P. E. Grayson and L. E. Brown), hereinafter referred to as defendants, from entering upon a certain tract of land allegedly belonging to him and from pulling or moving the casing, tubing, and other equipment from the two gas wells thereon situated.

The plaintiff alleged that he is the owner of a certain tract of land; that two fully equipped gas wells of a value of $1,000 each are located thereon; that the defendants entered upon said land and asserted their right to remove the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Grayson v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Oklahoma City v. BlondinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. State v. EckertWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pyle v. Pennington Groc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Ray v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Tibbetts v. Sight 'N Sound Appliance Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API