Logronio v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiff’s claim is for pay he claims is due him as an officer in the Philippine Army. His claim covers three periods: (1) from December 18, 1941 to April 8, 1942; (2) from April 8, 1942 to September 9, 1943; and (3) from September 9, 1943 to March 31, 1945. Except for the second period, he has been paid by the Army of the Philippines under the Missing Persons Act of the Congress of the United States, Act of March 7, 1942, 56 Stat. 143, as amended, section 1001 et seq., Title 50 Ü.S.C.A.Appendix. His complaint is that he was given the pay of a sergeant, whereas he alleges he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moreno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Victorio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Victorio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Midgett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Cornelio R. Besinga v. United States of America U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Alpuerto v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Espartero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.