Legal Opinion

Victorio v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 10, 1950No. 49541PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Judge.

The defendant has moved the court to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the grounds that it does not state a cause of action within our jurisdiction and further that it ■does not comply with certain rules of the court.

We need only to consider defendant’s first ground for its motion as we consider that sufficient in itself to require a dismissal of the petition.

At the outset, it is well to emphasize that Title 28, § 1491, U.S.C.A., gives this court jurisdiction of claims only against the United States.

The petition in this case is entitled “Petition for Review and Reconsideration,”…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Logronio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Victorio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Logronio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API