Legal Opinion
Oregon Public Utility Commission v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1992No. 91-70276PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
The Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC) seeks review of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) exempting a transfer of operating rights under 49 U.S.C. § 11343. The case — of first impression in this circuit — involves the interpretation of the statute. We affirm the ruling of the ICC.
PROCEEDINGS
On August 23, 1990 Maddox Transfer and Storage, Inc. (Maddox) and Washington Trucking, Inc. (WTI) filed with the ICC a joint notice of exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 11343 pursuant to regulations of the ICC, 49 C.F.R. § 1186. WTI, a common carrier domiciled…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- County of Marin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- North Alabama Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
3Cited by13 opinions
- Karen Logan v. Us Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Dean Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Alaska Survival v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- J.B. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.