Legal Opinion

Cummer Lumber Co. v. Seminole Phosphate Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiAM.

Prior to February, 1923, R. H. McCrary was employed by defendant, Seminole Phosphate Company, as salesman in Eastern North Carolina. He had authority to make collections for the company. Out of sums of money in hand from collections, he, was authorized to pay expenses incurred in performance of his duties as salesman. There is a balance due him by the company, on account of salary and expenses, earned and incurred prior to February, 1923, of $876.46.

In February, 1923, McCrary was sent by the company to the State of Florida, to take complete charge of the company’s business in that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Young Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Hamilton v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Mauney v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Commercial Finance Co. v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API