Legal Opinion

Hoffmann-Laroche, Inc. v. Califano

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 10, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-0467PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

GESELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff manufactures LibriumR, the formerly patented form of chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride (“chlordiazepoxide”), a prescription drug used in the treatment of anxiety, tension, and other psychologically damaging diseases. Several other drug manufacturers now produce and supply chlordiazepoxide in generic form or under other brand names, but as recently as June 1977 LibriumR accounted for 99% of all sales of the drug. Defendants are the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and two other HEW officials: the Administrator of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Mining Ass'n v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  3. Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  4. Coalition for Common Sense in Government Procurement v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Sherley v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API