Legal Opinion

In re Jaime S.

New York City Family Court

Decided July 6, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan S. Kohout, J.

*461On February 18, 2005, the Monroe County Department of Human Services (DHS) filed an order to show cause pursuant to Family Court Act § 1039-b requesting that it be excused from providing reasonable efforts to assist the respondent Enedina E. and her son Jaime. Additionally, DHS filed a notice of motion on April 11, 2005 supplementing the original papers and seeking a modification of the last foster care placement order made on December 21, 2004 to terminate or, alternatively, suspend visitation. The respondent opposes the requests of DHS.

In preparation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. In re Sheila G.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In re Leon RRNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. In re Tammie Z.New York Court of Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Chaim A.K.New York Surrogate's Court · 2009
  2. In re the Guardianship & Custody of Paul C.New York City Family Court · 2010
  3. Matter of Jaime S.New York Family Court, Monroe County · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API