Boatmen's Bank v. Fritzlen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the'District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge. Action by the Boatmen’s Bank of St. Eouis, Mo., against D. G. Fritzlen. There was a decree for plaintiff on one cause of action, and in favor of defendant on his counterclaim, and each party brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error brought suit against Pritzlen to recover a money judgment. The case proceeded on two cases of action. The first was upon a note for $32,920.15, made on the oOlli of November, 1901, upon which a balance of $26,234.58 was claimed. The second cause was for money advanced for the keep and other expenses connected with a large number of cattle upon which Pritzlen had given a chattel mortgage, covering not only the indebtedness secured by tlie first count of complaint, but also the advances covered by the second count. The defendant answered, setting up a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chemung Canal Bank v. LowerySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Kirk v. AndrewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zainudin v. MeizelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Nadeau v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- New v. Denison Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Lappe v. WilcoxDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1926
- Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915