UATP IP, LLC v. Kangaroo, LLC
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. □ pistrict Cou ee Sathois District of Texas ENTERED UATP BP, LLC, et al., § May 24, 2022 § Nathan Ochsner, Clerk Plaintiff, § § versus § Civil Action H-21-2478 § Kangaroo, LLC, et al., § § Defendants. § Opinion on Partial Dismissal A. Background. UATP IP entered a franchise with Kangaroo LLC, to operate a Urban Air Adventure Park. Urban Air is a jumping gym secured by a patent for its “adventure hub.” UATP IP terminated the franchise when Kangaroo failed to pay the royalty required under the agreement. UATP IP says that Kangaroo…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McFadin v. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Genetic Implant Systems, Inc. v. Core-Vent Corporation and Gerald A. NiznickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Campbell Pet Co. v. MialeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Sel-Rex Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966