Legal Opinion
Genetic Implant Systems, Inc. v. Core-Vent Corporation and Gerald A. Niznick
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 1997No. 97-1010PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Genetic Implant Systems, Inc. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington dismissing its complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants Core-Vent Corporation and Gerald A. Niznick. Genetic Implant Sys., Inc. v. Core- Vent Corp., No. C95-0709Z (W.D.Wash. Apr. 23, 1996). Because the district court erred in determining that it lacked jurisdiction over Core-Vent, but did not err in determining that it lacked jurisdiction over Niznick, we reverse-in-part and affirm-in-part.
BACKGROUND
This appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Tyee Construction Co. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten Intern. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet LabsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.