Legal Opinion

Goon v. Gee Kung Tong, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1988No. 85-1440PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants participated in several private Chinese lending and borrowing organizations known as “wuis” which operated at the premises of appellee, Gee Kung Tong, Inc. When the wuis failed, appellants brought suit against appellee alleging that it had guaranteed their deposits. The trial court directed a verdict for appellee, based in part on the Statute of Frauds. A letter written by appellee’s attorney which purportedly admits liability was proffered to meet the Statute’s requirement of a writing of guaranty. We hold that the trial court erred in its ruling that this letter was an offer of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Evans Products Co. v. Clinton Building Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Crain v. AllisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Pyne v. Jamaica Nutrition Holdings Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. S.S. v. D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Allman v. SnyderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API