Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Chinatown Planning Council, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 19, 1989No. 792, Docket 88-4152Published

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Chief Judge:

This case involves the issue whether the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reasonably determined that Young Shi Lee was an employee within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C § 152(3). The Board is petitioning this court for enforcement of its order, dated September 13, 1988, directing the Chinatown Planning Council, Inc. (“CPC”) to cease and desist from unfair labor practices and to reinstate Young, whose discharge was predicated on his concerted, protected activities.

The undisputed facts are as follows. CPC is a not-for-profit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Physicians National House Staff Association v. John H. FanningCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API