Legal Opinion

Robison v. Beall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1858PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Debt in Muscogee. Superior Court. Tried before Judge Worrill, May Term, 1858. This was an action brought by defendant in error against Alexander J. Robison. The declaration alleges that Robison was a stockholder in-the “Planters and Mechanics Bank of Columbus” to the amount of 575 shares of stock, rated at $100 per share.

Read the full summary

Debt in Muscogee. Superior Court. Tried before Judge Worrill, May Term, 1858. This was an action brought by defendant in error against Alexander J. Robison. The declaration alleges that Robison was a stockholder in-the “Planters and Mechanics Bank of Columbus” to the amount of 575 shares of stock, rated at $100 per share. The charter of the bank provided “ that the persons and property of the stockholders shall be pledged and held bound in proportion to the amount of shares and the value thereof, that each individual or company may hold in said bank for the-ultimate redemption of the bills or…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

The Court decided that, Beall, the plaintiff, was not bound to answer any of the interrogatories propounded to him, ex*27cept the first. And the first question is, was that decision right ?

The interrogatories as to which this decision was made, had two objects in view; one, to prove that Beall obtained the bills at a discount — the other, to prove that he had made an agreement with his attorney, Mr. Dougherty, by which, Mr. Dougherty, was to bring suit for the collection of the bills, was to be responsible for the costs of suit, and was to have for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thornton v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Hightower v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  3. Lane v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  4. Robinson v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Bank of St. Mary's v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John M. Clark & Co. v. NeufvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  2. McCullar v. Credit Bureau Systems, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cumberland Tel. & Tel. Co. v. MaxberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Wehmhoff v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  5. Siders v. Gem City Concrete Co.Montgomery Circuit Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API