Legal Opinion

United States v. Ogden

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1900No. Nos. 25, 37PublishedCited by 25 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The testimony taken in support of this motion shows that, after the evidence and the arguments of counsel had been heard, and while the jury were awaiting the charge of the court, the following article from the North American, a newspaper published in the city of Philadelphia, was read by one of the jurors; that two other jurors read the displayed headlines, and that the article was to some extent spoken of in the jury room while the verdict was being considered:

“Oleo Dealer Ogden’s Boasted Pull of No Avail. Long Protected Man on Trial in Federal Court.
“Prosecut…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Meyer v. CadwaladerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1891

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. George Keith WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. State v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. People v. HryciukIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Harry Russell Briggs v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API