Legal Opinion

Crane v. Crane

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1995No. 93-FM-545 & 93-FM-676PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEISBERG, Associate Judge:

Appellant (“the wife”) appeals an order of the trial court which (1) denied her motion for production and in camera review of certain documents alleged to be in the possession of lawyers for appellee (“the husband”) and (2) granted the motion of the husband’s lawyer to withdraw as counsel. She argues that the trial judge abused his discretion in ruling on both motions. We affirm.

I. Background

This is the latest skirmish in a long-running domestic relations dispute that began in 1985 and has now spread across three continents. Much of the procedural history is set…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John Doe No. 1 v. Susan L. BurkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Esteves v. EstevesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Galloway v. ClayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Walter E. Lynch & Co., Inc. v. FuiszDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API