Legal Opinion
Cantor v. Van Noorden Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided June 23, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1. Those parts of the arguments which depend on the transcript of the testimony before the master must be disregarded for the reasons stated in Michelson v. Aronson, ante, 182, 183-190 (1976), which was decided after the instant appeal was argued. 2. Apart from any consideration of the releases executed on December 6, 1968, the master’s findings that the plaintiffs’ omission to mention the nonexistence of the bank account did not constitute fraud or deceit on their part and that the financial statements of E. Van Noorden Company in fact disclosed the nonexistence of the account (contrast…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Barry v. FrankiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Bandera v. DonohueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Bellefeuille v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Krasne v. Tedeschi & GrassoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Dowse, Inc. v. BrockunierMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
- Cummings Properties, LLC v. Empire Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.