King v. Stanton (In Re Stanton)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge:
Dr. T.O. King commenced an action against the debtor, Ms. Stanton, for dissolution of a partnership, an accounting, and a declaration that he was sole owner of the partnership assets. Ms. Stanton asked for the same relief and for a declaration that they held equal shares in the partnership assets. She also cross-claimed for damages. We affirm the trial court’s judgment as to the accounting and dissolution awarding Ms. Stanton a 42.28% interest in the partnership and 57.72% to Dr. King. We reverse and remand on Ms. Stanton’s cross-appeal for further proceedings…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,650 in Re Karen Virginia Stanton, Debtor. T.O. King v. Karen Virginia StantonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Sunset DevelopersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1987
- Burley v. American Gas & Oil Investors (In Re Heafitz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Wirum & Cash, Architects v. CashAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Gordon v. Stephenson (In Re Stephenson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.