Legal Opinion
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 28, 2022No. 3:21-cv-09703Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DANIEL HOWARD, Case No. 21-cv-09703-JSC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE 10 v. ANSWER AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER 11 TANIUM, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12 Defendant. 12 13 14 Daniel Howard, who is representing himself, filed this action in the San Mateo County 15 Superior Court alleging fraud-intentional misrepresentation by his former employer Tanium, Inc. 16 (Dkt. No. 1-2.) Plaintiff alleges that Tanium misrepresented the value of its stock for purposes of 17 the compensation package that he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.