Legal Opinion

Citizens' State Bank v. Christiansen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. File No. 6170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

The respondent bank began' this action for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage covering a Franklin automobile owned by the appellant. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The court found the facts to be as follows:

On September 25, 1924, defendant’s husband, Neis K. Christiansen, was indebted to the plaintiff bank in the sum of $1,507.22, by reason of an overdraft.

On said 25th day of September, 1924, the -defendant made and delivered to Hans Carstensen and F. M. Conklin her promissory note in the sum of $1,510 payable to the said Carstensen and Conklin, due December…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. KreppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bates v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Title G. Etc. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Walklin v. HorswillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bruce v. McCounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Daly's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. GoldbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Lawson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Coleman v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McDonald v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API