Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 9 v. Furlow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

The road improvement district involved in this controversy was created by special statute, designated as act No. 377 of the extraordinary session of the General Assembly of the year 1920, the territory described as constituting the district being situated in Little River County. Section 1 of the statute, after describing the boundaries of the district by metes and bounds, provides that said territory is created into a road improvement district “to be known as Road Improvement District No. 9 of Little River County, Arkansas, for the purpose of improving such public roads, or roads to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sallee v. DaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  2. Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Nall v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Cumnock v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Bush v. Delta Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lacefield v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Matlock v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Bradford v. BurrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API