Legal Opinion
Saltzman v. Birrell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 5, 1948PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendants in eleven motions have severally moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of improper venue, insufficiency of service of process, failure to join indispensable parties and forum non conveniens.
Plaintiff, a citizen of New Jersey, is the owner of 100 shares of stock in Claude-Neon, Inc. (hereinafter Claude), a New York corporation. He brings a stockholder’s derivative action on behalf of Claude and other corporations, subsidiaries and sub-subsidiaries of Claude, against certain individuals and corporations, none a citizen of New Jersey. Jurisdiction of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goldstein v. GroesbeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Suttle v. Reich Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Greenberg v. GIANNINICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schoen v. Mountain Producers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. Cementos Portland Valderrivas, S.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Citrin v. Greater New York Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Glicken v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Beury v. BeuryDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.