Legal Opinion

State v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1975No. 57PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant brings forward three assignments of error based on a total of three exceptions duly noted in the record.

Defendant first assigns error (Nos. 1 & 2) to the action of the trial court in denying his motion for “a directed verdict of not guilty” at the close of the State’s evidence and in denying his motion for “nonsuit” at the close of all the evidence. The question presented by these assignments is whether the evidence was sufficient to warrant its submission to the jury and to support a verdict of guilty of the offense charged in the first-degree murder indictment.…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API