G.W. v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KUEHN, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART:
¶ 1 I agree that this case must be remanded for further proceedings, but I respectfully disagree with some aspects of the Majority's analysis, and with overruling D.M.H. v. State , 2006 OK CR 22, 136 P.3d 1054.
¶ 2 The Majority believes this Court went too far in D.M.H. by requiring that a juvenile personally waive his right to a jury at an adjudication hearing "in open court on the record." Id. at ¶ 11, 136 P.3d at 1057. The Majority believes that in doing so, this Court erred by "elevating" the juvenile's statutory right to a jury trial to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.