Legal Opinion

Wheeless v. Eudora Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1974No. 74-11PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant seeks reversal of a deficiency judgment entered against him on a directed verdict in an action by appellee to recover the balance due on a promissory note signed by him. In December of 1969, appellant’s mother and father were experiencing marital troubles which eventually culminated in divorce. Appellant’s father was the title holder of an automobile on which he was indebted to appellee. He transferred the title to appellant who executed a promissory note to appellee for $2,196.36, representing principal, discounted interest and credit life insurance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Nelson v. Monarch Investment Plan of Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Rushton v. UM & M. CREDIT CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Page v. Boyd-Bilt, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. CartmellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Comfort Trane Air Conditioning Co. v. Trane Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Coristo v. Twin City BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Rhodes v. Oaklawn BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API