Legal Opinion

Rushton v. UM & M. CREDIT CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1968No. 5-4741PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Dr. Joe F. Rushton has appealed from a judgment in favor of U. M. & M. Credit Corporation for the balance due upon an installment note, representing the balance of the purchase price of a piece of equipment called a Loggers Yardster. The purchase was made on August 21, 1964 from Taylor Machine Works. The sale and purchase were on a conditional sale contract, dated on the date of sale, and reciting a purchase by “the undersigned.” Throughout the contract, the purchaser is referred to by that designation only. The name of Numark Manufacturing Company was signed by John…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nation Wide, Inc. v. ScullinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Crimmins v. LowryTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. White v. Household Finance CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Peoples Bank of Point Pleasant v. Pied Piper Retreat, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Southwest Florida Production v. SchirowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API