Brooks v. Ahrens
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, the appellee here, as surviving partner of William Stirling and Theodore Ahrens, trading as Stirling and Ahrens, against the defendant Brooks, the appellant on this appeal, to recover money had and received by the defendant, to the plaintiff’s use. The pleas were, never indebted, and never promised, as alleged. The case was tried before the Court, without the assistance of a jury ; and nearly all of the material facts of the case were agreed upon by the parties. The findings and judgment of the Court below were for the plaintiff, and the defendant has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Heirs of Emerson v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Leonard v. NyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Plater v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1834
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. HeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. State Of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- In re Banks' WillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Heard v. SturgisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Culp v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.