Legal Opinion

Conkey v. Knudsen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1942No. 31217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

In this cause are presented appeals by parties in interest from certain judgments entered by the district court for Dakota county, Nebraska, on the 6th and 7th days of January, 1941, determining certain lands in suit to be “an accretion area” and directing division thereof on that basis.

*518This is the second appearance in this court of an action to quiet title to certain real estate against the following named defendants: Hans Knudsen, Jr., Clara Knudsen, Hans Knudsen, Jack L. Hamp, Lewis W. Newman (who is the same person as L. W. Newman), Maggie Leedom, Pearl M. Sanford, Sene Knudsen, Maude…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Buttenuth v. St. Louis Bridge Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dorsey v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Commissioners of Land Office of Oklahoma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. EcklundNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Conkey v. KnudsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API