United States v. Retta-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Appellant Alejandro Retta-Hernandez (“Retta”) was convicted on a plea of guilty for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1326. At sentencing, the district court imposed an eight level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2002), on the basis that Retta’s previous theft conviction constituted an aggravated felony, and ultimately sentenced Retta to, inter alia, twenty-four months incarceration. On appeal, Retta contends that the district court erred in determining that his prior theft conviction qualified as an aggravated felony, and thus…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Banda-ZamoraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Yanez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Landeros-ArreolaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Francisco Vasquez-BalandranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Alejandro Rios-CortesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Arriola-CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Retta-Hernandez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004