State v. Reagan County Purchasing Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentSutton, Justice
The writer is unable to recede from the original and unanimous judgment and opinion of this Court, and, with slight additions thought necessary in view of the majority opinion, shall reproduce, in the main, what was originally said in disposing of the case.
As said in the majority opinion, much of the controversy centers around the construction of the price clause of the purchasing contract. In the writer’s view, the construction of the price clause is the very heart of the case and without the price clause there would have been no lawsuit. Virtually all the argument was devoted to that issue…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Niagara Insurance v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Sun Mutual Insurance v. Mattingly & RicketsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.