Legal Opinion

Powell v. Clements

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1931No. 7878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

This was a suit to set up an equitable assignment in parol, of an indefinite portion of a fund that might be obtained in the future, by the assignor in a contemplated suit against a third person upon an unliquidated money demand. It was not a suit at law to obtain a mere money judgment upon a chose in action. In Haas v. Old National Bank of Evansville, 91 Ga. 307 (18 S. E. 188), it was held: “A regular customer of a bank in the State of Indiana having consigned goods by railway to a point in Georgia, and taken a bill of lading showing on its face that he was the consignor and another person…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Jones v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Walton v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Baer v. English & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. First National Bank v. Hartman Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Engineers & Constructors Inc. v. Fiat Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Lindsay v. RickenbackerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Shadburn Banking Co. v. StreetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API