Powell v. Clements
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
This was a suit to set up an equitable assignment in parol, of an indefinite portion of a fund that might be obtained in the future, by the assignor in a contemplated suit against a third person upon an unliquidated money demand. It was not a suit at law to obtain a mere money judgment upon a chose in action. In Haas v. Old National Bank of Evansville, 91 Ga. 307 (18 S. E. 188), it was held: “A regular customer of a bank in the State of Indiana having consigned goods by railway to a point in Georgia, and taken a bill of lading showing on its face that he was the consignor and another person…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Jones v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Walton v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Baer v. English & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- First National Bank v. Hartman Steel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Engineers & Constructors Inc. v. Fiat Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Lindsay v. RickenbackerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Shadburn Banking Co. v. StreetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935