Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Lincoln Square Apartments Section 5, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 12, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanley P. Danzig, J.

The plaintiffs in the three above-captioned .small claims actions are all tenants of defendant landlord suing herein to recover for the costs of renting air-conditioning units for their apartments during a period of six weeks last summer when the central air conditioning system supplied and maintained by defendant was not in operation.

Paragraph 15 of the standard form lease used by defendant provides: “As long as there shall be no breach or default by tenant in respect of any provision of this lease, landlord shall furnish, to the extent that the existing facilities permit, the following: (a)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  2. Steinberg v. CarrerasCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  3. Volga Realty Corp. v. Chauncey Holt Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gaskin v. Stumm Handel GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. City and County of Honolulu v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Martin v. SchumacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Lefrak v. LambertCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
  5. Edgemont Associates v. SkolnickJustice Court of Town of Greenburgh · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API