Legal Opinion
Gargiulo v. Oppenheim
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The stipulation of the parties dated December 10, 1974 contained the following provision: “7. Neither the execution of this Stipulation nor the performance of its terms *845shall operate to settle, discontinue, abate or otherwise affect this action or the related action in the United States District Court or any other litigation, right to interest or other claims of any kind which may now or hereafter exist between the parties or any of them, or other persons, except that performance by plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gargiulo v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Estherville Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Cummings v. DresherNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Allianz Risk Transfer AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Feeney v. LicariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Wendy v. SpectorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ra Global Services, Inc. v. Avicenna Overseas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.