Legal Opinion
Ra Global Services, Inc. v. Avicenna Overseas Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 1, 2012No. 10 Civ. 2701 (NRB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs RA Global Services, Inc. (“RA Global”) and George E. Burch III bring this lawsuit alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, and conspiracy. Presently before us is the motion to dismiss of defendants Avicenna Overseas Corp. (“Avicenna”) and Hüseyin Gün (together, “defendants”) on the grounds of res judicata.
For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND1
I. Factual Background
RA Global provides global oilfield services and has operations on three continents. Burch…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- People v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Allianz Risk Transfer AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Clinton Group, Inc. v. De QuillacqDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Renois v. WVMF Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- The New Y-Capp, Inc. v. Arch Capital Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019