Guzell v. Kasztelanka Cafe & Restaurant, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti
delivered the. opinion of the court:
The plaintiff filed action against the defendants on a promissory note. The defendants defended on the ground of lack of consideration, and the trial court after hearing all the evidence so found. The plaintiff has appealed, contending:(1) the evidence was insufficient to overcome the presumption of consideration;(2) if in fact no consideration was given, the defendants are estopped to deny consideration since the note was used in obtaining a liquor license;(3) the defendants are estopped to deny consideration because they returned the note to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Shanahan v. SchindlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Broverman v. City of TaylorvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Steiner v. Rig-A-Jig Toy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Steven v. Falese Land Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Pedott v. DormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Rybak v. DresslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Palos Bank & Trust Co. v. KardarasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982