Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sandlin
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
At the outset of this opinion, it will serve to clarify the situation if we first consider the nature of a railroad ticket. It is the rule in .some jurisdictions that a railroad ticket, at least until cancelled, is the contract of carriage complete and self-contained without reference to anything dehors. Appellant places the emphasis of its brief on this theory. The doctrine in other jurisdictions and the one fixed in Kentucky is that as between the passenger and the carrier the ticket is a mere moranduan of a contract, the real and true details…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Southern Ry. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Illinois Central R. R. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- McKinley v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Illinois Central Railroad v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Brumfield v. Consolidated Coach CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Guy v. Interstate Transit, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932