Legal Opinion

Florida Pawnbrokers & Secondhand Dealers Ass'n v. City of Fort Lauderdale

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided November 17, 1988No. 87-7008-CIVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

Can the state authorize police officers to seize allegedly stolen property from a pawnbroker without notice and hearing? This question is before the court upon the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.

The plaintiffs, Florida Pawnbrokers and Secondhand Dealers Association, Inc. and Happy Hocker Pawnshop, Inc. (“Happy Hocker”) are corporations engaged in the pawnbroking business. On three or four occasions, police officers employed by the defendant, the City of Fort Lauderdale, seized pawned property from the plaintiffs’ establishments. The City does not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Surplus Store and Exchange, Inc. v. City of DelphiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Dunbar Corp. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Landers v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Florida Pawnbrokers & Secondhand Dealers Ass'n v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
  5. Wong v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API