Legal Opinion
Landers v. Jameson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 4, 2003No. 03-114PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of two Arkansas statutes: Ark. Code Ann. §§ 18-27-202 and -203 (1987). Appellant Gil Landers d/b/a Big Daddy’s Pawn Shop contends that the statutes are unconstitutional, as applied to him, because no notice and no hearing were afforded to him prior to the time that his property interest was impaired. Appellee Ken Jameson, the true owner of the property hi question, asserts that the statutes adequately provided due process protection to the Pawn Shop. We disagree in light of Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972), and our own…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- PPS, Inc. v. Faulkner County, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Solis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Beebe v. Fountain Lake School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- McLane Southern, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.