Legal Opinion

United States v. A. C. Monk & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 5, 1932No. 4445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree dated May 23, 1930, directing that libelant recover damages as directed in the decree, in a suit for cargo damage. The decree was entered without opinion, but «m opinion was thereafter filed on April 8,1931. (D. C.) 49 F.(2d) 442. Amended assignments were therefore filed after the opinion. Two suits are involved in the ease before the court. The libelant, at the same time, filed two actions; one being the present suit for cargo damage, and the other for general average contribution, ete. Both suits arise out of the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. C. Monk & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Zifferer v. Atlantic Lines, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
  5. Calcot, Ltd. v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API