Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
On petition for rehearing appellant filed a vigorous and extensive1 brief. *43It raises questions regarding all of the main issues which were before the court on the original consideration of the appeal. We granted a rehearing, and the matter was again argued at length, and we again affirm the judgment below.
1. Validity of the Lighterage Clauses.
This court’s opinion rested, essentially, upon the reasoning embodied in the trial court’s decision. Both decisions hold that appellant cannot, by contract, avoid liability for negligent injury to cargo when such injury occurs before the cargo is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The EddySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Richardson v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Caterpillar Overseas, S.A., Libellant-Appellant v. S.S. Expeditor and American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- John Joel Rogers and Carolyn Cox Rogers v. Eagle Offshore Drilling Services, Inc. And Midland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- F. J. Walker, Limited, Orleans International, Inc. v. The Motor Vessel "Lemoncore," Her Engines, Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Nassau Marine Corp., Central Marine Service and Canal Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.