Legal Opinion
Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 20, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
Appellees, the plaintiffs below, filed a replevin action in the trial court alleging that they were the owners of certain television sets which were unlawfully seized by the defendant and praying for the return of the television sets together with damages for loss of use of said sets.
In its answer the defendant admitted that it had possession of certain television sets found in the possession of one Lester B. Holmes, a tenant of the property in which the sets were found; that the said Lester B. Holmes owed the sum of $948.73 for rent and that the sets were being held pursuant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Murphey v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. FriermoodArizona Supreme Court · 1973