Legal Opinion

Breakstone v. Buffalo Foundry & Machine Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1913Published

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, J.

When this case came on for trial the court ruled that it would hold that the time within which defendant had to regain possession of the machine and advertise the sale did not begin to run until the defendant had time by the use. of ordinary diligence to regain full possession of the machine. Plaintiffs’ counsel, it seems, mistakenly concluded that the ruling disposed of plaintiffs’ case and so stated; thereupon the complaint was dismissed. Then plaintiffs’ counsel moved for a new trial upon the ground of his mistake in making such a statement. I think that a new trial should be granted■…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. New York Bank Note Co. v. Hamilton Bank Note Engraving & Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Davis v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Roach v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API