Legal Opinion

Peterson v. United States

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 16, 1963No. Civ. No. F-5-62PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLUMMER, District Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiffs under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b) and 2671-2680, to recover money damages for injury and loss of property allegedly caused by the negligent dynamiting of an ice jam which had formed in the Chena River within the boundaries of Ladd Air Force Dase, near Fairbanks, Alaska, on May 2, 1960, by representatives of the Corps of Engineers.

Plaintiffs were the owners of the following registered vessels, with appurtenances, miscellaneous facilities, equipment, tools, fuel and supplies used in conj unction therewith:

Name…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Solon B. Clark, Jr., and Geraldine A. Clark, Husband and Wife, and Related Cases v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Stover v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donald J. Peterson and Louise J. Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Morici Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1980
  3. In Re Katrina Breaches Consolidated Lit.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007
  4. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
  5. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API