Legal Opinion
Pyles v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 22, 2002No. CIV.A. 00-2394-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Warren K. Pyles brings employment discrimination and retaliation claims against The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. as amended, the Kansas Acts Against Discrimination, K.S.A. § 44-1001 et seq. and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #47) filed September 28, 2001. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion.
Defendant asserts that it is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zone Five, LLC v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2023