Goodeagle v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Indian Claims; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Individual Indian Money Accounts; Lost Profits; Statutory Interpretation; Partial Summary Judgment.
OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WHEELER, Judge.
This ease arises from an alleged breach of fiduciary duty by the Government in failing to prudently invest funds held in trust on behalf of individual members of the Quapaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma. Plaintiffs, Grace M. Goodeagle et al, are holders of Individual Indian Money (“IIM”) accounts managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”). They are claiming damages for account…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Jicarilla Apache NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Western Shoshone Identifiable Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019