Legal Opinion

United States v. Krizek

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 15, 1998No. CIV. A. 93-00054PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on remand from the Court of Appeals’ decision in this case, United States v. Krizek, 111 F.3d 934 (1997) (“Krizek III”). Dr. Krizek was a psychiatrist who practiced in Washington, D.C. for over twenty years. On January 11, 1993, the Government brought suit against Dr. George Krizek and his wife, seeking over $80 million in penalties and damages on the basis of false Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement claims. The Government sought damages on the basis of unjust enrichment and violations of the False Claims Act.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. George O. Krizek, M.D., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  3. United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Krizek, George O.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API