Legal Opinion
United States v. Krizek
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-0054PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
The United States filed suit against George O. Krizek, M.D. and his wife Blanka H. Krizek, alleging that they had violated the False Claims Act, 81 U.S.C. § 8729, by submitting false and inflated claims for reimbursement for psychiatric services allegedly provided to Medicaid/Medicare patients. Following a three week bench trial, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order on July 19, 1994. United States v. Krizek, 859 F.Supp. 5 (D.D.C.1994). The Court ruled that the defendants had submitted false claims and had violated the False Claims Act. Id.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. George O. Krizek, M.D., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Krizek, George O.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. KrizekDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998