Legal Opinion
In re the Probate of the Will of McInally
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 22, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
The instrument propounded by the Public Administrator of this county is alleged to have been executed on May 3,1949 at Glasgow, Scotland. The decedent died a resident of this county. The Surrogate is asked to grant probate under the provisions of sections 22-a and 23 of the Decedent Estate Law upon the submission of proof that the instrument was executed in Scotland in the mode prescribed by the laws of that country. The sole nominated executrix has renounced letters *626testamentary. All necessary parties have executed waivers of citation and consent to probate and have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- David v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- In re the Estate of KutznerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of BeneventanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of RandNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
- In re the Estate of ArcowskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arens v. ShainswitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- In re the Estate of HughsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- In re the Estate of TatoneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966